Back to Gap-Down Screener
LAR
DIP-BUYLithium Argentina AG
Weak/overshoot de-rating + elevated bounce probability
Gap Down
-6.5%
Basic MaterialsEPS Aug 11, 2026
Price Chart
Range
LAR · DailyEMA 12EMA 26EMA 50EMA 200
Gap-Down Information
Prev Close
$7.10
Open
$6.64
Gap %
-6.5%
Close
$6.60
Day High
$6.92
Day Low
$6.46
Volume
453.7K
Vol vs 50d Avg
0.2x
Score Analysis
Model 1: De-Rat Score (HIGH = solid selloff = avoid)
Composite40/ 100
Gap Quality (30%)46
Volume Quality (25%)25
Earnings Quality (25%)50
Technical Context (20%)48
Model 2: Bounce Probability (HIGH = dip-buy)
P(bounce)85%20d horizon
Tier:HIGH
Expected 20d Return+8.0%
Trained on 563 gap-downs across 142 tickers (2y backtest). Distance from SMA50 (mean reversion) is the strongest predictor; wide gap-day range = capitulation washout.
Verdict & Playbook
DIP-BUYWeak/overshoot de-rating + elevated bounce probability
Dip-Buy Entry Ref
$6.60
Stop (gap-day low)
$6.46
vs SMA 200
—
SMA 50
$7.66
SMA 200
—
EMA 10
$6.53
Analysis
LAR gapped down 6.5% (0.25× average volume). De-Rat Score: 40/100 — weak/overshoot selloff. P(bounce): 85% [HIGH] — expected +8% over 20 trading days.
Analyzed by derat-v1+bounce-v1 · Aug 11, 2026
Outcome Tracking
1d Return
+3.2%
5d Return
-6.7%
20d Return
—
Post-Gap Validation — 5-Day Follow-Through
⚠️ Uncertain
Confidence55%
Days Tracked5/5
Reversal Score14.5
Selloff Score12.0
Recovery
44%
Vol Decay
36%
Further Downside
-6.7%
Max Recovery
+7.0%
Peak Close
Day 3
Day-by-Day Price Action
| Day | Close | High | Low | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | $6.81 | $6.95 | $6.62 | 2.92M |
| Day 2 | $6.75 | $7.03 | $6.67 | 2.41M |
| Day 3 | $6.82 | $7.06 | $6.76 | 1.93M |
| Day 4 | $6.60 | $6.92 | $6.51 | 1.80M |
| Day 5 | $6.16 | $6.53 | $6.16 | 1.88M |
Signal Breakdown
- Recovery44.0% recoveredneutralPartial recovery (44%) — ambiguous
- Volume36% decayneutralModerate volume decline (36%)
- Price TrajectoryPeak close: Day 3selloffPeak close on day 1 with lower lows — no recovery, distribution continues
- Further Downside6.7%neutralModerate further downside (6.7%)
- Fundamental QualityInsufficient dataneutralNo fundamental data to evaluate