Back to Dashboard

JBHT

failed

J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

Gap
+7.1%
IndustrialsEPS Jul 15, 2026

Price Chart

Range
JBHT · DailyEMA 12EMA 26EMA 50EMA 200

Gap Information

Current
Prev Close
$276.28
Open
$296.00
Gap %
+7.1%
Close
$298.41
Day High
$299.76
Day Low
$286.75
Volume
2.47M
Vol vs 50d Avg
2.4x
Highly Significant Volume

Score Analysis

Model 1: Rerate Score

Composite59/ 100
Gap Quality (30%)60
Volume Quality (25%)63
Earnings Quality (25%)50
Technical Context (20%)55

Model 2: Trade Probability

P(win)33%20d horizon
Tier:AVOID
Expected Return-2.0%
Trained on 240 trades across 142 tickers (2y backtest). Volume sweet spot (1-2×) and tight ATR risk are strongest predictors.
Forward P/E
24.50
PEG Ratio
2.10
FCF Trend
stable
Buyback
No

AI Thesis

J.B. Hunt's 7.1% gap on 2.42x average volume signals that Wall Street is interpreting this print as a potential freight-cycle inflection point rather than just a single-quarter beat. The transportation/logistics sector has been mired in a prolonged freight recession since 2022, with excess capacity, soft demand, and depressed pricing across both truckload and intermodal. If JBHT is showing volume stabilization in its Intermodal (JBI) segment, margin improvement in Dedicated (DCS), or — most critically — any commentary about pricing power returning or capacity exiting the market, that would trigger meaningful repricing because investors have been positioned defensively in transport names for quarters. The magnitude of the volume surge (2.42x) suggests institutional accumulation, not just retail momentum — this is the type of volume profile associated with hedge funds and long-only managers repositioning on a narrative shift. JBHT's intermodal franchise is structurally advantaged via its BNSF partnership, and any data point suggesting modal share gain or intermodal volume growth would be viewed as high-quality, durable revenue. With the stock having traded depressed relative to historical multiples during the freight downturn, even modest evidence of a cycle turn could justify a multi-quarter rerating as the market prices in 2025-2026 earnings power recovery.

Analyzed by rerate-v2+glm-5.2 · Jul 23, 2026

Catalysts

  • Intermodal volume growth or load acceleration signaling modal shift back to rail from truckload
  • Pricing stabilization or improvement commentary, especially in JBI contract renewals
  • Dedicated Contract Services (DCS) fleet productivity gains and margin expansion
  • Industry capacity exiting the truckload market, tightening supply-demand dynamics
  • Potential upward revision to full-year volume or operating ratio guidance
  • Signs of broader freight market recovery — this is a high-beta proxy for economic re-acceleration

Risks

  • Freight recession persists longer than expected — this could be a false dawn (dead cat bounce in a cyclical name)
  • Overcapacity in truckload continues to pressure intermodal pricing and competitiveness
  • Wage inflation and driver shortage dynamics compressing margins even if volumes recover
  • Diesel fuel cost volatility impacting operating costs
  • Class I railroad service issues degrading intermodal product reliability and volume growth
  • Macro slowdown or recession risk reducing freight demand just as capacity tightens
  • Stock was above 50-SMA ($271.67) and 10-EMA ($283.29) — the gap may have already front-run the fundamental improvement

Technical Setup

Setup Type
Failed Gap
Entry Price
Stop Loss
vs SMA 200
SMA 50
$271.67
SMA 200
EMA 10
$283.29

Forward Returns

1-Day
-1.6%
5-Day
-2.2%
20-Day
60-Day
Max Gain
+0.7%
Max Drawdown
-10.6%

Outcomes calculated Jul 31, 2026

Post-Gap Validation — 5-Day Follow-Through

🚫 Pump & Dump
Confidence95%
Days Tracked5/5
Pump & Dump Score26.5
Rerating Score4.0
Gap Fill
41%
Vol Decay
32%
Max Drawdown
-4.0%
Max Gain
+-0.1%
Peak Close
Day 3

Day-by-Day Price Action

DayCloseHighLowVolume
Day 1$291.41$298.10$289.181.55M
Day 2$290.61$293.07$286.941.13M
📍 Day 3$293.26$294.71$287.451.05M
Day 4$292.24$294.14$290.551.04M
Day 5$289.37$294.00$286.381.05M

Signal Breakdown

Gap Fill40.8% erased

Gap partially filled (41%) — ambiguous

8w
Volume Decay32% decline

Moderate volume decline (32%)

4w
Price TrajectoryPeak close: Day 3

Lower highs with peak close on day 1 — price action suggests distribution, not accumulation

12w
Max Drawdown4.0%

Moderate drawdown (4.0%)

3w
Fundamental QualityInsufficient data

No fundamental data to evaluate beat quality

0w

Analysis updated Jul 31, 2026