Back to Dashboard

AFRM

resolved

Affirm Holdings, Inc.

Gap
+10.8%
Financial ServicesEPS Aug 27, 2026

Price Chart

Range
AFRM · DailyEMA 12EMA 26EMA 50EMA 200

Gap Information

Current
—
Prev Close
$77.49
Open
$85.88
Gap %
+10.8%
Close
$84.83
Day High
$90.44
Day Low
$84.36
Volume
6.13M
Vol vs 50d Avg
1.7x
Highly Significant Volume

Score Analysis

Model 1: Rerate Score

Composite66/ 100
Gap Quality (30%)51
Volume Quality (25%)93
Earnings Quality (25%)59
Technical Context (20%)62

Model 2: Trade Probability

P(win)33%20d horizon
Tier:AVOID
Expected Return-2.0%
Trained on 240 trades across 142 tickers (2y backtest). Volume sweet spot (1-2×) and tight ATR risk are strongest predictors.

Model 3: Tail Probability (Runner)

P(runner)22.1%60d ≥ +20%
Tier:WEAK
Below anchored VWAP+0.0%
Frozen walk-forward logistic model (OOS AUC 0.64–0.68). Ranks the fat tail — many small losses, a few huge 60-day runners. STRONG tier historically hit ~44% (vs 25% base). A ranking tool, not a certainty.
Forward P/E
55.00
PEG Ratio
1.30
FCF Trend
rising
Buyback
No

AI Thesis

Affirm's +10.8% gap on 1.69x average volume — despite a marginal -1.3% EPS miss — tells you the market is pricing the structural story, not the headline number. For Affirm, the EPS consensus is noisy because the company is just crossing into sustained GAAP profitability; what actually moves the stock is GMV growth acceleration, RLTC (revenue less transaction costs) margin expansion, and forward guidance. A gap of this size that also clears the 50-day SMA ($77.38) while holding well above the 200-day ($66.55) is characteristic of institutional accumulation on unit-economics conviction rather than a short squeeze, since short interest in AFRM has normalized from prior years. The rerating case rests on Affirm's position as the scale leader in US BNPL with privileged distribution: the installment option inside Apple Pay in the US, deep Amazon checkout integration, and Shopify native checkout. Each of these channels compounds GMV growth while fixed technology and funding infrastructure scales, so incremental volume flows disproportionately to RLTC and operating income. Falling short-term rates are a direct tailwind — Affirm's warehouse funding costs reprice down faster than the consumer APRs it charges, expanding spread. Add the Affirm Card ramp (debit-plus-installments driving repeat usage and rising transactions per active consumer) and the company now has multiple vectors for growth that don't require new merchant wins. The bigger repricing question is how the Street categorizes Affirm. Sustained GAAP profitability makes it eligible for S&P 500 inclusion consideration, which would force passive buying and broaden the holder base beyond growth/fintech funds. If management raised FY guidance and GMV growth is accelerating into a consumer environment where BNPL takes share from revolving credit cards, analysts shift models from 'speculative fintech' to 'emerging compounder,' and the multiple expands alongside estimates. The offset is that this remains a richly valued, rate- and consumer-credit-sensitive story where a growth deceleration or credit normalization would compress the multiple hard — but the tape (gap + volume + moving-average structure) suggests the market is giving the benefit of the doubt to the bull path.

Analyzed by rerate-v2+glm-5.2 · Aug 28, 2026

Catalysts

  • Apple Pay US exclusivity ramp — Affirm is the sole installment provider inside Apple Pay, a massive free distribution channel
  • Amazon and Shopify checkout integrations driving GMV growth acceleration and reduced partner renewal risk
  • Declining funding costs as the Fed cuts — warehouse/facility costs reprice down while consumer APRs hold, expanding RLTC margin
  • Affirm Card adoption increasing transactions per active consumer and deepening engagement economics
  • Sustained GAAP profitability opening the door to S&P 500 index inclusion eligibility and passive fund buying
  • Possible FY GMV and revenue guidance raise supporting upward analyst estimate revisions
  • 0% APR merchant-subsidized loans improving conversion without Affirm bearing full interest-rate risk

Risks

  • Consumer credit deterioration — rising delinquencies or charge-offs would inflate provision expense and undermine the profitability narrative
  • Anchor-partner concentration — Amazon and Apple drive a large share of GMV; renegotiated economics or in-housing (especially by Apple) is an existential tail risk
  • Intensifying competition from Klarna (now public), PayPal, Zip, and bank-backed BNPL products compressing take rates
  • Rate path reversal — a hawkish repricing would raise funding costs and squeeze the spread that drives the margin expansion thesis
  • Valuation sensitivity — an elevated forward P/E leaves little room for GMV deceleration or a guidance disappointment
  • CFPB regulation treating BNPL like credit cards raises compliance costs, though it may also entrench scaled incumbents
  • Ongoing stock-based compensation dilution (~4% annual share count growth) partially offsetting per-share value creation

Technical Setup

Setup Type
Failed Gap
Entry Price
—
Stop Loss
—
vs SMA 200
Above
SMA 50
$77.38
SMA 200
$66.55
EMA 10
$78.13

Forward Returns

1-Day
-13.3%
5-Day
-15.8%
20-Day
—
60-Day
—
Max Gain
-10.4%
Max Drawdown
-23.1%

Outcomes calculated Sep 11, 2026

Post-Gap Validation — 5-Day Follow-Through

🚫 Pump & Dump
Confidence95%
Days Tracked5/5
Pump & Dump Score100.0
Rerating Score0.0
Gap Fill
100%
Vol Decay
67%
Max Drawdown
-18.4%
Max Gain
+-9.3%
Peak Close
Day 1

Day-by-Day Price Action

DayCloseHighLowVolume
📍 Day 1$74.45$76.95$71.2311.69M
Day 2$69.94$73.32$69.547.96M
Day 3$74.09$74.93$69.245.92M
Day 4$74.30$75.99$73.244.10M
Day 5$72.35$73.75$71.873.86M

Signal Breakdown

↓
Gap Fill100.0% erased

Gap 100% filled — price gave back most of the post-earnings gap

25w
↓
Volume Decay67% decline

Volume dropped 67% from day 1 — no institutional follow-through buying

20w
↓
Price TrajectoryPeak close: Day 1

Lower highs with peak close on day 1 — price action suggests distribution, not accumulation

20w
↓
Max Drawdown18.4%

Drew down 18.4% from gap close — significant give-back

15w
↓
Fundamental QualityGap 10.8% vs EPS beat -1.3%

Gap of 11% with only -1.3% EPS beat — price reaction disproportionate to fundamentals

20w

Analysis updated Sep 11, 2026